Thanks for a great year!
Cheers,
Michael
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Armed guards contract takes shape
Preliminary discussions took place on 6th December to agree the format for a new standard contract for the employment of armed guards on vessels, co-ordinated by BIMCO.
The new contract, which will be known as GUARDCON, will offer shipowners a well thought through agreement crafted by a team of shipowners, lawyers, underwriters and P&I Club personnel, all of whom have considerable experience developing and working with this type of agreement, the Danish-based organisation claimed.
Two major law firms are involved in the project - Ince & Co and Holman Fenwick Willan, both of whom have experience representing security firms and shipowners in these types of contracts.
At the top of the agenda are the insurance aspects and the underwriting and P&I club input is invaluable, BIMCO said.
BIMCO also said that its ultimate objective in developing this standard contract is to provide an agreement that clearly sets out the responsibilities and liabilities of the parties involved, particularly in respect of the potential use of lethal force on board the vessel.
It is essential that shipowners should have the comfort of a standard contract that they can use safe in the knowledge that it will not prejudice their P&I cover and that it provides for the security company to carry adequate liability insurance.
Rules on the use of force will form an important integral part of the new agreement and will be based on IMO Guidelines 1405/1406, BIMCO said.
A first draft is currently being prepared for review by the sub-committee at its next meeting on 6th January.
It is hoped that the project can be completed towards the end of January.
Sunday, December 18, 2011
Kolskaya Sinks: Russian Oil Drilling Rig Capsizes, Leaving 49 Missing
MOSCOW, Dec 18 - An oil drilling rig with 67 crew on board capsized and sank off the Russian Far East island of Sakhalin on Sunday when it ran into a storm while being towed, leaving 49 of the crew unaccounted for, the regional Emergencies Ministry said.
Fourteen crew members were rescued alive from the 'Kolskaya' jack-up rig, operated by Russian offshore exploration company Arktikmorneftegazrazvedka (AMNGR), and four bodies were recovered. The rest of the crew were missing.
"The floating drilling rig capsized 200 kilometers (125 miles) off the coast of Sakhalin island at 12.45 local time (0145 GMT)," the Emergencies Ministry said in a statement on its website.
The statement said a rescue craft and helicopters had been sent to the site to scour the waters for survivors, but Russian news agencies said rescue work had been halted until Monday morning as night fell in the far eastern region.
The 'Neftegaz-55' tugboat that had been towing the Kolskaya rig and had taken part in the search effort, pulled out after suffering hull damage near its engine room. An icebreaker, the 'Magadan', was at the scene.
Most of the missing crew were from the Russian far eastern town of Magadan, said a spokesman for AMNGR, a unit of state-owned Zarubezhneft. The company, based in the northern port of Murmansk, flew out counsellors to offer support to relatives.
RIG WAS WORKING FOR GAZPROM
The rig had been doing work in the Sea of Okhotsk for a unit of state-controlled gas export monopoly Gazprom, the company said.
It was heading to the port city of Kholmsk on the western side of Sakhalin island from the eastern peninsula of Kamchatka when strong winds and high waves capsized the vessel.
Russia's prize offshore gas and oil fields lie to the northeast of the island.
No oil spill was likely, but the disaster will deal a blow to efforts by Russia, the world's largest energy producer, to step up offshore oil and gas exploration to offset a long-term production decline at its onshore production sites.
Russia has two major offshore projects that are already producing oil and gas off Sakhalin - Sakhalin-1, operated by Exxonmobil and Sakhalin-2, operated by Royal Dutch Shell and in which in which Gazprom has a controlling stake.
The disaster is unlikely to seriously affect oil or gas production.
Gazprom said the vessel was no longer under contract when it sank, a spokesman for the company told Interfax.
Operating conditions at the Sakhalin fields, explored by Soviet geologists in the 1960s and 1970s, are among the harshest for Russian energy companies.
OFFSHORE DRILLING
The jack-up rig, which has support legs that can be extended to reach the ocean floor while its hull floats on the ocean surface, was overturned while in the stormy winter conditions. Waves in the waters were reportedly 5-6 metres high.
"The violation of safety rules during the towing of the drilling rig, as well as towing without consideration of the weather conditions, in so far as the rig was being towed in strong storm conditions, is believed to be the cause of the (disaster)," investigators said, state news agency RIA reported.
Winter often lasts 220-240 days in the waters off Sakhalin, where the main companies operating are ExxonMobil, Gazprom, and Royal Dutch Shell, who produce oil and gas, sometimes in icebound conditions, for export largely to Asian markets.
The Sakhalin-2 project run by Shell, Gazprom and Mitsui , produces 10 million tonnes per year of liquefied natural gas (LNG) at Russia's only LNG plant in the southeastern port of Prigorodnoye for export to Asia, much of it to Japan.
Each tanker of crude oil produced by at the 160,000 barrels-per-day Sakhalin-1 project, operated by ExxonMobil, is escorted by two icebreakers when ice thickness reaches 60 centimeters.
State-controlled Rosneft this year reached a major deal with Exxon to explore for oil and gas in the Kara Sea, to the north of the Russian mainland, a largely unexplored region estimated to hold over 100 billion barrels of oil.
A combination of poor infrastructure and chronic corner cutting has dealt the country its share of sea disasters, noteably the 2000 sinking of the nuclear submarine Kursk in the Barents Sea in August 2000, killing all 118 aboard and prompting criticism of the sluggish response.
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Friday, December 16, 2011
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Gold Sheds 'Can't Lose' Status: Now, No One Wants It
By: John Melloy
Executive Producer, Fast Money & Halftime
In just three months, gold [XAU= 1569.70 -4.49 (-0.29%) ] has gone from the trade that works in every kind of market to the trade that doesn’t work in any market.Executive Producer, Fast Money & Halftime
Tom Grill | Iconica | Getty Images |
For a time, gold rose with stocks and other assets as central banks added liquidity to stem off a global financial crisis. It also climbed in down equity markets as investors crowded into the trade for its traditional status as a store of value in tough times.
“Gold was a safe haven, a hedge and a speculative trade all at the same time,” said Michael Murphy, CEO of Rosecliff Capital, a hedge fund. “Long gold has been a winning trade for years. We expect the selloff in gold to gain momentum into 2012. Traders are finding better hedges, better safe havens, and better speculative commodity plays than long gold.”
Gold was up more than 25 percent in 2011 through early September. The market value of leading gold exchange-traded fund , the SPDR Gold Trust [GLD 152.804 -0.086 (-0.06%) ] , ballooned to $73 billion in November as investors poured more money into gold funds than any other asset class. In just four days, the gold sell-off has turned violent, plummeting more than $100 to breach the $1,600 level. On Wednesday gold fell with stocks. The next day, the metal fell even as the equity market rose.
“When an asset is thought to work in any market, that is the surest sign of a bubble,” said Stephen Weiss of Short Hills Capital. “I believe we will hear about massive central bank selling to put currency in markets.”
RELATED LINKS
Current DateTime: 09:58:56 15 Dec 2011
LinksList Documentid: 45684165
Gold gained some notable backers along its bull run, which only added to the speculative fervor. Most notably, hedge fund manager John Paulson has made the SPDR Gold Trust ETF his firm’s single largest holding.
The flagship fund run by Paulson, who’s received more accolades than anyone for profiting from the housing bust, is down more than 40 percent for 2011 at last count. With the recent drop in gold, it’s likely down even more, if he isn’t selling.
To be sure, gold has always been a volatile trade that can turn on a dime. Unlike a stock, there are no earnings behind the metal. It’s only worth as much as what the next guy will pay for it. That dynamic has been skewed by the ETF and other retail money flowing into the trade this year, say long-term gold bulls.
“Bull markets climb a wall of worry,” said Peter Schiff, CEO of Euro Pacific Capital “These sharp drops shake out the speculators and keep other would-be buyers on the sidelines. Once the weak longs are cleared out, the trip to $2,000 and beyond will resume unencumbered by excess baggage.”
For the best market insight, catch 'Fast Money' each night at 5pm ET, and the ‘Halftime Report’ each afternoon at 12:00 ET on CNBC. Follow @CNBCMelloy on Twitter.
______________________________________________________
John Melloy is the Executive Producer of Fast Money. Before joining CNBC, he was an editor for Bloomberg News, overseeing the U.S. Stock Market coverage team. Click here to see his full bio.
John Melloy is the Executive Producer of Fast Money. Before joining CNBC, he was an editor for Bloomberg News, overseeing the U.S. Stock Market coverage team. Click here to see his full bio.
_________________________________________________
Got something to say? Send us an e-mail at fastmoney-web@cnbc.com and your comment might be posted on the Rapid Recap! If you'd prefer to make a comment, but not have it published on our Web site, send your message to fastmoney@cnbc.com .
© 2011 CNBC.com
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Qatar Petroleum celebrates 11,000th export shipment
http://www.tankstoragemag.com/industry_news.php?item_id=4379
Qatar Petroleum’s Mesaieed Terminal & Export Department has celebrated the 11,000th export shipment of Qatar Land Crude Oil from its terminal facility at the industrial city.
The 11,000th shipment of Qatar Land Crude was loaded to the tanker ‘Towada’ on Monday 12 December. The loading operation was inaugurated by Said Mubarak al-Mohannadi, QP director (Operations) from the Multi Product Berth Control Room at the Mesaieed Terminal.
The first-ever crude oil shipment from Qatar was made from the same terminal on December 31, 1949 on the tanker President Meny. The tanker carried about 94,000 barrels, which took approximately 72 hours to load.
In contrast, the 11,000th shipment of approximately 653,000 barrels was loaded in just about 12 hours.
Over the past 62 years of continuous development, Mesaieed has become one of the major export terminals in the Middle East. As part of its ongoing development, a new multi product berth jetty has been constructed in Mesaieed, thus making it possible to load crude oil and refinery naphtha at the same time from the control room.
Simultaneously, the terminal’s storage and export facilities have undergone comprehensive modernisation and upgrade. All these would now enable Qatar Petroleum to accommodate higher-capacity tankers, bigger parcel sizes and export multiple products in much less time than before.
Qatar Petroleum’s Mesaieed Terminal & Export Department has celebrated the 11,000th export shipment of Qatar Land Crude Oil from its terminal facility at the industrial city.
The 11,000th shipment of Qatar Land Crude was loaded to the tanker ‘Towada’ on Monday 12 December. The loading operation was inaugurated by Said Mubarak al-Mohannadi, QP director (Operations) from the Multi Product Berth Control Room at the Mesaieed Terminal.
The first-ever crude oil shipment from Qatar was made from the same terminal on December 31, 1949 on the tanker President Meny. The tanker carried about 94,000 barrels, which took approximately 72 hours to load.
In contrast, the 11,000th shipment of approximately 653,000 barrels was loaded in just about 12 hours.
Over the past 62 years of continuous development, Mesaieed has become one of the major export terminals in the Middle East. As part of its ongoing development, a new multi product berth jetty has been constructed in Mesaieed, thus making it possible to load crude oil and refinery naphtha at the same time from the control room.
Simultaneously, the terminal’s storage and export facilities have undergone comprehensive modernisation and upgrade. All these would now enable Qatar Petroleum to accommodate higher-capacity tankers, bigger parcel sizes and export multiple products in much less time than before.
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Bakken Boom Pumping Profits into “Pipelines on Wheels”
http://www.investmentu.com/2011/December/bakken-pumping-profits-into-pipelines.html
by David Fessler, Investment U Senior Analyst
Tuesday, December 13, 2011: Issue #1663
Around the end of the Civil War, many soldiers looked to return home by hitching a ride on a freight train. Others, looking for work, hid in freight cars headed westward in the late nineteenth century. They became known has “hobos.”
But these days, hopping a freight train in North Dakota, especially in the dead of winter, would be a death knell for a hobo. That’s because all the cars are tankers, loaded with crude. There’s no place to hide from the cold. They’re all headed south, delivering oil to refineries along the Gulf Coast.
Most investors in the energy sector are thoroughly familiar with the “Bakken Boom.” The Bakken formation is a 25,000-square-mile chunk of oil- and gas-bearing rock that underlies part of North Dakota, Montana and Saskatchewan.
It’s responsible for the revolution in shale oil and shale gas that’s taken the area by storm over the last few years. It’s the primary reason North Dakota’s overall unemployment rate is a whopping two percent. That’s less than a quarter of the national average.
Estimates for how much oil the Bakken contains vary. According to North Dakota’s Geological Survey, up to 169 billion barrels of oil may lie trapped within Bakken shale. That would run the entire country for over a decade at present usage rates.
The oil- and natural gas-bearing rock is an average of 150 feet thick. However, it can be as thin as fifty feet in some places. Oil and natural gas were discovered here way back in the 1950s.
It proved impractical to extract either, mostly because they were tightly trapped in the thin layer of shale rock that makes up the Bakken formation.
But horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing changed all that. Drilling companies are able to drill down to the oil- or natural gas-bearing layer, turn the drill bit, and then follow it for miles.
Once the well is completed, the surrounding rock is hydraulically fractured, and the cracks are propped open. This allows oil and gas to flow out of the well to the surface.
These two processes have completely changed oil and gas drilling in the United States. Nowhere is that more apparent than in the Bakken.
The “Bakken Boom” is responsible for the quadrupling of North Dakota’s oil production since 2005. Take a look at these charts from the EIA. The data is based on information from the North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources.
This past September, the state’s oil production averaged over 460,000 barrels per day (bbl/d). That’s nearly five times September 2005 levels. Oil production has increased to the point where North Dakota oil production is only surpassed by Alaska, Texas and California.
But the Bakken is just beginning to be exploited. Just over 200 rigs are currently drilling there. Projections are for at least 10 more by the end of the year, according to a study undertaken by the Associated Press.
No Way Out
All that drilling has created a backlog on the back end of the process. North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) data currently indicated there are over 350 drilled wells awaiting fracturing services.
As more and more wells are fractured, oil production will continue to increase. The DMR is forecasting an oil production jump of 100 percent to as much as 750,000 bbl/d by 2015. This is higher than the 700,000-bbl/d estimate it gave earlier this year.
There’s just one problem: There isn’t enough pipeline capacity to get all this oil out of North Dakota. The proposed BakkenLink Pipeline, which will connect up to nine terminals to the big TransCanada Pipeline, won’t be completed for at least two years.
The Keystone Pipeline, designed to haul crude from the Alberta oil sands and transport it south, was also supposed to pick up crude from the Bakken.
It’s also “under review” by the EPA, and won’t be addressed until after the 2012 elections. This will eventually get approved, but right now it’s a political football being used by the party in power to garner votes. Bad idea…
All this pipeline posturing presents a golden opportunity for the freight transportation method that’s been a mainstay of the United states for well over 100 years: railroads.
Keystone Pipeline Delay Spells Opportunity for Railroads
Even when these pipelines get approved, it will take years to build them. The Keystone is 2,000 miles long. That means railroads will be the transportation method of choice for years to come.
Hess Corporation (NYSE: HES), one of the operators developing Bakken acreage, understands this all too well. This year, it’s spending a big chunk of the $1.6 billion earmarked for its Bakken operations on a new railroad loading terminal and storage facility.
When completed, Hess will be able to ship 130,000 barrels a day via rail. The company has plans to triple its Bakken shipments in the next five years to over 80,000 barrels per day from its current level of 25,000.
With pipelines on hold and oil flows continuing to rise at record rates, railroads servicing the Bakken are sitting on a cash cow for the foreseeable future. Investors might want to consider using dips in the market to pickup shares of any of the three companies mentioned above.
Good Investing,
David Fessler
NNPC can’t account for 65,000 barrels of oil daily
*N1.02bn daily not accounted for
BY HENRY UMORU & INALEGWU SHAIBU
ABUJA – The Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC, yesterday failed to give account of 65,000 barrels of crude oil out of the 445,000 barrels of crude allocated to it daily for domestic consumption.
Making the first public account of the utilization of its domestic allocation at the Senate public hearing on the management of the fuel subsidy regime of the Federal Government, the corporation’s officials also disclosed that 20% of the cost of imported fuel represented the component associated with importation.
Nigeria’s brent crude was selling at $97.89 yesterday translating to a daily $6.362 million or N939 million daily that cannot be accounted for.
The Group Managing Director of the NNPC Mr. Austion Oniwon led senior officials of the corporation to the Senate hearing presided over by Senator Magnus Abe, Chairman of the Senate committee on Petroleum, Downstream.
Giving a breakdown of the utilization of the 445,000 barrels of oil allocated to the NNPC for utilization by the local refineries, Mr. Oniwon disclosed that the corporation sells 65,000 barrels of the allocation to a foreign oil company and another 65,000 barrels of the lot is refined by Societe Ivoirienne De Refinnage in Cote Di’ Voire. He, however, claimed ignorance of the 65,000 barrels sold daily.
Oniwon while giving the breakdown of the management of its daily crude allocation told the committee that only 170,000 barrels of the daily allocation were refined locally.
He said, “Warri refines 80,000 barrels; Port Harcourt, 90,000 barrels, while Kaduna refinery is shut down due to the problems with the pipelines.”
He also told the committee that the NNPC swapped 60,000 barrels per day of its daily allocation for refined products to a United Kingdom based company called Trafigura, while another 90,000 barrels per day was allocated in another round of swapping to Duke Oil, a subsidiary of NNPC.
On the retail price of crude, he told the committee that the corporation before 2003 was buying crude oil locally at a reduced price, paying between $9.50 and $22 per barrel between 1999 and 2003, but a change of policy has led the NNPC to be buying crude at international oil market price.
Subsidy has been abused — Oniwon
Mr. Oniwon also revealed to the committee that subsidy has been abused at all levels saying, “Whether at the crude level or at the product level, subsidy was subject to abuse, phasing it out completely was the way forward.”
Also making presentation to the committee, the Executive Secretary of the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency, PPPRA Mr. Reginald Elijah, declined responsibility for providing security at the tank farms where imported products were stored even after paying subsidies on the products.
Mr. Elijah was responding to concern by members of the committee that the products for which subsidies had been paid had been left in the hands of the beneficiaries as he argued that it was not within the purview of the PPPRA to provide security at the tank farms.
On the rationale for the computation of the components of the subsidy, he noted that there were various charges, as well as the actual price of crude in the international market.
According to Elijah, the price of crude accounted for 80 per cent of what becomes the cost of the pump price of PMS, adding that the 20 per cent represented charges ranging from storage, finance, admin, freight and distribution elements.
Chairman of the Committee, Senator Magnus Abe queried the management of subsidy on diesel (automated gas oil, AGO) and kerosene describing it as sham by oil companies.
He said, “I do not understand what talk about deregulation because what we have in this country is for oil companies to come together and connive to import AGO and sell to the public. Clearly what is happening in the market is not deregulation it is price fixing.”
OPEC Said to Agree to 30 Million-Barrel Output, Delegate Says
By Ayesha Daya
(Bloomberg) -- Members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries including Iran and Venezuela are in agreement that the group should set a production ceiling of 30 million barrels a day, an OPEC delegate said.
The group may not allocate individual quotas to each of the 12 nations because there may be disagreement on how the total oil output should be distributed, the person said, declining to be identified because the matter hasn’t been decided.
To contact the reporter on this story: Ayesha Daya in Dubai at adaya1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Raj Rajendran at rrajendran4@bloomberg.net
Oil trudges on as PIB stalls new investments
http://www.thenationonlineng.net/2011/index.php/business/energy/29597-oil-trudges-on-as-pib-stalls-new-investments.html
By DANIEL ESSIET
2011 was an eventful year for the oil and gas sector, writes DANIEL ESSIET
As the Nigerian economy continues to grow – peaking at 7.72 per cent in the second quarter of 2011 and projected to hit 7.98 per cent by the end of this year energy demands have equally continued to rise.
The demands stemmed from increase in economic activity, population and the epileptic nature of power in the country that has required industries and homes to generate their energy needs. This has helped the sector to witness active performance. International companies also made efforts to acquire stakes in oil and gas blocks, form joint ventures and source natural gas to meet rising fuel demand. They consider Nigeria’s good source of hydrocarbon potential and new gas discoveries.
It is a good year for the oil majors as profit margins was aided by high oil prices. Demand for oil was comparatively robust.
On the balance, the government’s energy plan placed emphasis on natural gas. This followed the government‘s commitment to use gas as part of a broader emphasis on renewable sources of energy and economic growth. The year saw little closures on account of militant attacks but new investments were stalled owing to non-passage of the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB).
PIB stalls operations
Major upstream development projects in Nigeria accruing to billions of naira have been stalled as a result of lingering delay in the passage of the PIB.
The situation has become a growing concern as most service providers who incidentally are responsible for oil industry workforce have confirmed the lull in contract awards owing to refusal of International Oil Companies, IOC, from investing in upstream development projects in the country.
The IOC, on their part, has continually stated that they cannot afford to invest without a clear fiscal and regulatory terms to work with. That, according to them, can only be made available if the PIB is passed.
Some oil service providers said the situation is threatening to wipe out the gains recorded so far in the implementation of the Nigerian content policy as most of the firms have started massive lay-off of staff due to long period of redundancy.
They also argued that the situation may have put the key targets and objectives of the Nigerian Content law on reverse course.
Managing Director of DeltaAfrik, an indigenous Engineering Company, Akin Odumakinde, while speaking on the evolution of local content policies among African governments, noted that the delay in the passage of the PIB has stalled key development projects expected to yield significant patronage for the local firms.
He emphasised that local firms providing services in the oil industry have been constrained to lay off over 80 per cent of their staff to cut overhead costs and keep afloat in a period of acute business lull.
Odumakinde said following long period of inactivity, the petroleum industry has remained stagnant in the past five years when the crisis about the contents of the bill raged.
Besides, the development of Shells operated Bonga Southwest field and Total operated Egina field - two key deepwater projects have been stalled due to disputes over the PIB.
Reports that the PIB, which prescribed a comprehensive fiscal overhaul of the Nigerian petroleum laws, has been the subject of heated debate in the industry since its introduction to the National Assembly last five years.
The disputes have led to innumerable reviews and interventions in the law, resulting in protracted delays that have become difficult resolve given the new composition of the National Assembly.
Shell oil block sale
Two local firms - First Hydrocarbon Nigeria (FHN) owned by Afren and Neconde Energy - a consortium including Nigerian firms Nestoil, Aries and VP Global and Poland’s Kulczk Oil Ventures have completed the purchase of 45 per cent stakes in two onshore oil blocks, previously owned by Shell, Total and Eni .
First Hydrocarbon Nigeria (FHN) bought a 45 per cent stake in OML 26 owned jointly by Shell, Total and Eni, the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) said. The block has target production of 50,000 barrels of oil per day by 2015.
The corporation also said the foreign oil majors sold 45 per cent of OML 42 to Neconde Energy. These blocks are among several ones put up for sale this year by Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), a joint venture between Shell (30 per cent), Total (10 per cent), Eni (5 per cent) and NNPC (55 per cent).
NNPC is transferring its stake in the former SPDC blocks to Nigerian Petroleum Development Company (NPDC), the exploration and production arm. NPDC and FHN will jointly operate production from OML 26.
Blocking leakages
The government and the oil sector are struggling to find a compromise deal that could PIB from collapse. Several measures were taken to block revenue leakages in the oil and gas sector. One of such was audit of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). Directive was given to the NNPC to submit its budget to the National Assembly, in line with the provision of the Constitution and the Fiscal Responsibility Act.
Shell accepts spills
Shell Nigeria also accepted liability for oil spills at Bodo in Ogoniland following a class action suit in London. Proceedings against Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) Nigeria began in the high court on April 6, 2011.
Shell Nigeria accepted responsibility for the 2008 double rupture of the Bodo-Bonny trans-Niger pipeline that pumps 120,000 barrels of oil a day though the community.
The crude oil that gushed unchecked from the two Bodo spills, which occurred within months of each other, in 2008 has clearly devastated the 20 sq km network of creeks and inlets on which Bodo and as many as 30 other smaller settlements depend for food, water and fuel.
To boost power supply, the Federal Government signed two gas supply agreements with Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) and other stakeholders.
The deals were signed by the Petroleum Resources Minister Deziani Alison-Madueke and representatives of oil and gas operators Shell, Chevron, Agip, Total and Power Holding Corporation of Nigeria (PHCN).
Investment Plan
The Federal Government unveiled a massive $130 billion investment plan for sustainable growth and development in the oil and gas sector within the next five years.
Also, plans are in top gear for the construction of additional 2,000km of oil and gas pipelines across the country.
Mrs. Alison-Madueke said the five-year investment plan was designed to promote rapid inflow of foreign investments into the Nigerian oil and gas industry as well as develop in-country capacity.
She said part of the money would be used for the gas utilisation projects, which include the construction of world class petrochemical plant at Koko in Delta State, fertiliser manufacturing plants and three Greenfield refineries in Lagos, Bayelsa and Kogi States.
The minister listed some of the areas that required foreign investment intervention to include Engineering design and related services, petroleum engineering services, fabrication and construction, pipe mills and equipment leasing. others include civil works, logistics and haulage, financial services, as well as in the areas of hospitality services for construction workers.
The minister stated that the 2,000km pipeline would transport gas to the thermal power generation plants to ensure availability of adequate gas for stable electricity supply.
She added that numerous contractual agreements would soon be signed in this regard.
The minster stated that the government was committed more than ever before to end gas flares, stressing that the focus on gas projects was part of the government's concerted effort to stop flaring of associated gas.
Mrs Alison-Madueke said the government's plan to increase domestic gas consumption from the current one billion cubic feet per day to five billion cubic feet within the next five as provided for in the massive gas infrastructure development projects.
Investments in oil and gas exploration before the end of the year is also expected to reach $45 billion (N67 trillion) according to the Nigerian Association of Petroleum Explorationists (NAPE).
NAPE President, Mr Jide Ojo, stated that investment would be about $35 billion (N5.25 trillion) higher than that of 2010, adding that the industry was able to recover from the economic depression of 2009.
He said: “The projected increase in spending will provide opportunities for sustainable growth in the oil and gas sector.
“It will also lead to increase in the gas base supply as well as investment in infrastructure that will facilitate increase in the domestic consumption.”
By DANIEL ESSIET
2011 was an eventful year for the oil and gas sector, writes DANIEL ESSIET
As the Nigerian economy continues to grow – peaking at 7.72 per cent in the second quarter of 2011 and projected to hit 7.98 per cent by the end of this year energy demands have equally continued to rise.
The demands stemmed from increase in economic activity, population and the epileptic nature of power in the country that has required industries and homes to generate their energy needs. This has helped the sector to witness active performance. International companies also made efforts to acquire stakes in oil and gas blocks, form joint ventures and source natural gas to meet rising fuel demand. They consider Nigeria’s good source of hydrocarbon potential and new gas discoveries.
It is a good year for the oil majors as profit margins was aided by high oil prices. Demand for oil was comparatively robust.
On the balance, the government’s energy plan placed emphasis on natural gas. This followed the government‘s commitment to use gas as part of a broader emphasis on renewable sources of energy and economic growth. The year saw little closures on account of militant attacks but new investments were stalled owing to non-passage of the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB).
PIB stalls operations
Major upstream development projects in Nigeria accruing to billions of naira have been stalled as a result of lingering delay in the passage of the PIB.
The situation has become a growing concern as most service providers who incidentally are responsible for oil industry workforce have confirmed the lull in contract awards owing to refusal of International Oil Companies, IOC, from investing in upstream development projects in the country.
The IOC, on their part, has continually stated that they cannot afford to invest without a clear fiscal and regulatory terms to work with. That, according to them, can only be made available if the PIB is passed.
Some oil service providers said the situation is threatening to wipe out the gains recorded so far in the implementation of the Nigerian content policy as most of the firms have started massive lay-off of staff due to long period of redundancy.
They also argued that the situation may have put the key targets and objectives of the Nigerian Content law on reverse course.
Managing Director of DeltaAfrik, an indigenous Engineering Company, Akin Odumakinde, while speaking on the evolution of local content policies among African governments, noted that the delay in the passage of the PIB has stalled key development projects expected to yield significant patronage for the local firms.
He emphasised that local firms providing services in the oil industry have been constrained to lay off over 80 per cent of their staff to cut overhead costs and keep afloat in a period of acute business lull.
Odumakinde said following long period of inactivity, the petroleum industry has remained stagnant in the past five years when the crisis about the contents of the bill raged.
Besides, the development of Shells operated Bonga Southwest field and Total operated Egina field - two key deepwater projects have been stalled due to disputes over the PIB.
Reports that the PIB, which prescribed a comprehensive fiscal overhaul of the Nigerian petroleum laws, has been the subject of heated debate in the industry since its introduction to the National Assembly last five years.
The disputes have led to innumerable reviews and interventions in the law, resulting in protracted delays that have become difficult resolve given the new composition of the National Assembly.
Shell oil block sale
Two local firms - First Hydrocarbon Nigeria (FHN) owned by Afren and Neconde Energy - a consortium including Nigerian firms Nestoil, Aries and VP Global and Poland’s Kulczk Oil Ventures have completed the purchase of 45 per cent stakes in two onshore oil blocks, previously owned by Shell, Total and Eni .
First Hydrocarbon Nigeria (FHN) bought a 45 per cent stake in OML 26 owned jointly by Shell, Total and Eni, the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) said. The block has target production of 50,000 barrels of oil per day by 2015.
The corporation also said the foreign oil majors sold 45 per cent of OML 42 to Neconde Energy. These blocks are among several ones put up for sale this year by Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), a joint venture between Shell (30 per cent), Total (10 per cent), Eni (5 per cent) and NNPC (55 per cent).
NNPC is transferring its stake in the former SPDC blocks to Nigerian Petroleum Development Company (NPDC), the exploration and production arm. NPDC and FHN will jointly operate production from OML 26.
Blocking leakages
The government and the oil sector are struggling to find a compromise deal that could PIB from collapse. Several measures were taken to block revenue leakages in the oil and gas sector. One of such was audit of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). Directive was given to the NNPC to submit its budget to the National Assembly, in line with the provision of the Constitution and the Fiscal Responsibility Act.
Shell accepts spills
Shell Nigeria also accepted liability for oil spills at Bodo in Ogoniland following a class action suit in London. Proceedings against Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) Nigeria began in the high court on April 6, 2011.
Shell Nigeria accepted responsibility for the 2008 double rupture of the Bodo-Bonny trans-Niger pipeline that pumps 120,000 barrels of oil a day though the community.
The crude oil that gushed unchecked from the two Bodo spills, which occurred within months of each other, in 2008 has clearly devastated the 20 sq km network of creeks and inlets on which Bodo and as many as 30 other smaller settlements depend for food, water and fuel.
To boost power supply, the Federal Government signed two gas supply agreements with Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) and other stakeholders.
The deals were signed by the Petroleum Resources Minister Deziani Alison-Madueke and representatives of oil and gas operators Shell, Chevron, Agip, Total and Power Holding Corporation of Nigeria (PHCN).
Investment Plan
The Federal Government unveiled a massive $130 billion investment plan for sustainable growth and development in the oil and gas sector within the next five years.
Also, plans are in top gear for the construction of additional 2,000km of oil and gas pipelines across the country.
Mrs. Alison-Madueke said the five-year investment plan was designed to promote rapid inflow of foreign investments into the Nigerian oil and gas industry as well as develop in-country capacity.
She said part of the money would be used for the gas utilisation projects, which include the construction of world class petrochemical plant at Koko in Delta State, fertiliser manufacturing plants and three Greenfield refineries in Lagos, Bayelsa and Kogi States.
The minister listed some of the areas that required foreign investment intervention to include Engineering design and related services, petroleum engineering services, fabrication and construction, pipe mills and equipment leasing. others include civil works, logistics and haulage, financial services, as well as in the areas of hospitality services for construction workers.
The minister stated that the 2,000km pipeline would transport gas to the thermal power generation plants to ensure availability of adequate gas for stable electricity supply.
She added that numerous contractual agreements would soon be signed in this regard.
The minster stated that the government was committed more than ever before to end gas flares, stressing that the focus on gas projects was part of the government's concerted effort to stop flaring of associated gas.
Mrs Alison-Madueke said the government's plan to increase domestic gas consumption from the current one billion cubic feet per day to five billion cubic feet within the next five as provided for in the massive gas infrastructure development projects.
Investments in oil and gas exploration before the end of the year is also expected to reach $45 billion (N67 trillion) according to the Nigerian Association of Petroleum Explorationists (NAPE).
NAPE President, Mr Jide Ojo, stated that investment would be about $35 billion (N5.25 trillion) higher than that of 2010, adding that the industry was able to recover from the economic depression of 2009.
He said: “The projected increase in spending will provide opportunities for sustainable growth in the oil and gas sector.
“It will also lead to increase in the gas base supply as well as investment in infrastructure that will facilitate increase in the domestic consumption.”
Monday, December 12, 2011
US Navy presses ahead with biofuels
http://thefuelhandler.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=67&Itemid=60&item_id=4363
The US Navy says it is to adapt a biofuel blend for aircraft and vessel use which will be put in use near Hawaii around the middle of next year.
About 450,000 gallons of biofuels will power a navy carrier group during a maritime exercise as part of a $12 million (€8.95 million) deal with Dynamic Fuels, which is a joint venture between Tyson Foods and Syntroleum.
Solazyme will also work with Dynamic Fuels on the contract, although its company uses algae-derived biofuel whilst Dynamic works with biofuel produced from used cooking oil and non-food grade animal fats.
Navy secretary Ray Mabus says the ship and aircraft will use drop-in biofuels made up of a 50-50 blend of petroleum-based diesel and aviation fuel. He says the initiative will help to create better energy security because fossil fuels are ‘a very real threat to our national security, and to the US Navy’s ability to protect America and to project power overseas.’
‘This is not only going to help the navy … [and] our national security, but it’s going to help the farmers and agriculture in the United States,’ he adds.
US Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack says the Agricultural Research Service and National Forest Service scientists have been looking at more non-food feed stocks for biofuels and the Forest Service announced $118 million for further development in this.
‘This announcement, I think, underscores the fact that the future for the navy … [and] this country lies in energy security, and basically controlling our own destiny by producing our own fuels in a creative and innovative way,’ Vilsack says.
The US Navy says it is to adapt a biofuel blend for aircraft and vessel use which will be put in use near Hawaii around the middle of next year.
About 450,000 gallons of biofuels will power a navy carrier group during a maritime exercise as part of a $12 million (€8.95 million) deal with Dynamic Fuels, which is a joint venture between Tyson Foods and Syntroleum.
Solazyme will also work with Dynamic Fuels on the contract, although its company uses algae-derived biofuel whilst Dynamic works with biofuel produced from used cooking oil and non-food grade animal fats.
Navy secretary Ray Mabus says the ship and aircraft will use drop-in biofuels made up of a 50-50 blend of petroleum-based diesel and aviation fuel. He says the initiative will help to create better energy security because fossil fuels are ‘a very real threat to our national security, and to the US Navy’s ability to protect America and to project power overseas.’
‘This is not only going to help the navy … [and] our national security, but it’s going to help the farmers and agriculture in the United States,’ he adds.
US Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack says the Agricultural Research Service and National Forest Service scientists have been looking at more non-food feed stocks for biofuels and the Forest Service announced $118 million for further development in this.
‘This announcement, I think, underscores the fact that the future for the navy … [and] this country lies in energy security, and basically controlling our own destiny by producing our own fuels in a creative and innovative way,’ Vilsack says.
India eyes Ghana oil stake
India has expressed interest in Ghana’s oil industry, according to officials in the Indian government.
State-owned Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) and GAIL Limited are said to be companies gunning for a stake in Ghana’s oil business.
According to a report by Press Trust of India on December 9, 2011, S. Jaipal Reddy, India’s Oil Minister, said at the 3rd India-Africa Hydrocarbon Conference in New Delhi that India is keen to participate in exploration and production opportunities in Ghana as well as other African states like Angola, Sudan, Nigeria and Cote d’Ivoire.
According to Jaipal Reddy, the IOC and GAIL are also looking at picking up an equity stake in Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) projects in Africa to meet the growing energy needs of India.
“Our companies such as GAIL, Petronet LNG and IOC are interested in sourcing LNG on a long-term basis from Africa; explore possibilities of equity participation in existing/proposed LNG liquefaction projects; business opportunities in gas processing and gas-based petrochemical projects in Africa; and farm-in opportunities in producing gas blocks for conversion to LNG and dispatch to India,” Press Trust of India quoted Reddy as saying.
“In the years ahead, we seek more crude oil and LNG from Africa,” he added.
India is the world’s fourth-largest oil importer after the US, China and Japan and it is estimated that in the next five years, India’s demand for liquid petroleum products will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.7%, while the demand for gas is expected to grow at a CAGR of 14%.
At present, natural gas accounts for around 10% of India’s primary energy basket, as against world average of 24%, according to the Press Trust of India.
By Ekow Quandzie
Friday, December 9, 2011
Tullow sees Ghana oil at target by early 2012
By Kwasi Kpodo
ACCRA (Reuters) - British oil firm Tullow Oil said on Thursday it hoped production from its Jubilee oil field in Ghana would reach 120,000 barrels per day by "early next year", narrowing the possible timing of a target delayed twice already.
The offshore field started pumping in December 2010, vaulting Ghana's economic growth into the double-digits, but plateau output has been put off twice in the second half of 2011 by technical problems.
"It's only a technical problem. The Jubilee resources are intact so we are hoping to reach the 120,000 bpd (target) early next year," Tullow spokesman Gayheart Mensah told Reuters.
The outlook narrows down guidance provided by Tullow Chief Financial Officer Ian Springett last month that the 120,000 bpd target would be achieved "sometime during 2012".
Analysts have said a lack of clarity on Jubilee - Tullow's only major producing field - was impacting the stock price of the company. Tullow shares were down 2.4 percent at 1830
GMT.
The onset of oil revenues in Ghana, also a major cocoa and gold producer, has helped propel annual growth to over 16 percent, making it one of the world's fastest growing economies. But significant delays to targeted oil production could dent revenues to the treasury.
Another Tullow official said on Thursday the company was not "overly worried" about a maritime boundary dispute between Ghana and its western neighbour Ivory Coast.
The two countries are currently in protracted talks on offshore boundary limits after Ivorian authorities produced a map claiming parts of the Jubilee field.
"This is a political issue that will be resolved at governmental level," Rosalind Kainyah, vice president for External Affairs told Reuters.
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Shell, Eni buy Nigeria offshore oil field rights
LAGOS, Nigeria (AP) — Royal Dutch Shell PLC and Italian oil firm Eni SpA have purchased rights to an offshore oil field near Nigeria's coast that could hold as much as 9 billion barrels of oil, the companies said Thursday.
The purchase ends a long dispute over who would run the field held by a company with ties to a former oil minister during the military rule of Sani Abacha, whose kleptocratic rule saw billions stolen from Nigeria. It also signals oil firms remain willing to expand in Nigeria, despite unease over a long-running debate about changing the laws that govern crude production in a nation vital to U.S. energy supplies.
The oil field sits near French oil firm Total SA's Akpo offshore field, more than 100 miles (150 kilometers) off the coast of Nigeria's Rivers state. Experts believe the field holds oil reserves that would put it among some of the top fields in the world.
In separate statements, Shell and Eni confirmed the purchase of the fields. Shell said the field's production would be split 50-50 among the two companies, with Eni running the operations of the deep-water oil drilling and production.
Neither company disclosed the price it paid for the field. A spokesman for the state-run Nigerian National Petroleum Corp., which partners with foreign firms working in the country's oil fields, did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.
The sale ends an ongoing dispute between Shell and local company Malabu Oil and Gas, which has links to former Nigerian oil minister Dan Etete who served in Abacha's regime in the 1990s. Shell had earlier been signed to produce oil there under Malabu, but the deal fell apart and the two firms became entangled in lawsuits.
It remains unclear how the deal was brokered, but both Eni and Shell said they did not enter into any deals with Malabu Oil and Gas to close the deal. Shell also said it paid its portion of the sales price to the federal government.
The deal comes as Nigeria still considers whether to overhaul laws surrounding oil production. Debate over the Petroleum Industry Bill had caused foreign companies to hold off on new investments in Nigeria. Analysts say the petroleum bill would sharply reduce the profits of foreign oil companies like Chevron Corp., ExxonMobil Corp., Eni, Shell and Total.
Government officials say the bill would allow more oil money to return to Nigeria's people.
However, the bill has apparently stalled after years of discussion and it remains unclear whether Nigeria's National Assembly will be able to pass any change to the laws soon.
Nigeria, an OPEC member nation producing about 2.4 million barrels of crude oil a day, is a top supplier to the U.S.
Production in the country picked up in recent years after a government-sponsored amnesty deal brought many militants in the region out of its winding creeks. However, thefts from oil pipelines have grown drastically and some ex-fighters have become disenchanted with the amnesty program.
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Obama pledges 'rigorous' review of pipeline
By BEN FELLER
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama pledged a 'rigorous review' of a proposal for an oil pipeline between the U.S. and Canada after a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
The Obama administration's move to delay a decision on whether to proceed with the pipeline was poorly received in Canada, which views the project as critical to its economy. Labor groups in the U.S., as well as Republican lawmakers, also see the pipeline as an opportunity to create much-needed jobs in the U.S.
The White House has denied that politics caused the project's delay, saying further review is needed in order to balance job creation and energy security with public health and safety.
During a joint appearance with Harper, Obama said it is important that all the issues "are properly understood."
Iran's Warning of Oil Prices Reaching $250 Barrel
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/raymond-j-learsy/irans-warning-of-oil-pric_b_1133687.html
Ramin Mehmanparast, spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, laid it out for all to hear. Reacting to the possibility of new Western penalties that could reduce its oil exports, he issued a warning that oil prices could more than double to $250/barrel ("Penalties May Send Oil Prices Soaring, Iran Warns," New York Times, 12.06.11).
Really!? Are you afraid? Well don't be. Should Europe cut off imports of Iranian oil, as they already have with Syrian oil in solidarity with the Syrian people's suffering under its current murderous rulers, the impact on the oil market would be minimal. For Iran, given the impact of economic sanctions already in place and beginning to have meaningful effect, it could be fatally disruptive to the current regime.
Consider the following: Europe's daily imports of Iranian oil are approximately 450,000 barrels/day. Europe's total consumption of oil exceeds 15 million barrels/day. The International Energy Agency, charged with the oversight of Europe's strategic oil reserves, controls a supply equivalent to 90 days of European oil consumption, or well in excess of a billion barrels of oil, near double the 750 million barrels held in the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Enough, in itself, to cover the Iranian shortfall for several years, more than enough time to effect regime change in Iran.
Then, of course there are the millions of barrels/day excess capacity that could be brought on stream from the Gulf Cooperation Council comprising Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar the United Arab Emirates, and most especially Saudi Arabia, whose interests viz a viz Iran are in line with the interests of Europe, the United States and the rest of the world's unease at the prospect of nuclear weapons in the hand of messianic fanatics.
Ramin Mehmanparast, spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, laid it out for all to hear. Reacting to the possibility of new Western penalties that could reduce its oil exports, he issued a warning that oil prices could more than double to $250/barrel ("Penalties May Send Oil Prices Soaring, Iran Warns," New York Times, 12.06.11).
Really!? Are you afraid? Well don't be. Should Europe cut off imports of Iranian oil, as they already have with Syrian oil in solidarity with the Syrian people's suffering under its current murderous rulers, the impact on the oil market would be minimal. For Iran, given the impact of economic sanctions already in place and beginning to have meaningful effect, it could be fatally disruptive to the current regime.
Consider the following: Europe's daily imports of Iranian oil are approximately 450,000 barrels/day. Europe's total consumption of oil exceeds 15 million barrels/day. The International Energy Agency, charged with the oversight of Europe's strategic oil reserves, controls a supply equivalent to 90 days of European oil consumption, or well in excess of a billion barrels of oil, near double the 750 million barrels held in the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Enough, in itself, to cover the Iranian shortfall for several years, more than enough time to effect regime change in Iran.
Then, of course there are the millions of barrels/day excess capacity that could be brought on stream from the Gulf Cooperation Council comprising Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar the United Arab Emirates, and most especially Saudi Arabia, whose interests viz a viz Iran are in line with the interests of Europe, the United States and the rest of the world's unease at the prospect of nuclear weapons in the hand of messianic fanatics.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
IMO Assembly addresses piracy
The recent IMO Assembly adopted a resolution urging governments to continue their efforts to combat piracy and armed robbery against vessels off Somalia.
At the meeting held between 21st and 30th November, the Assembly also passed a resolution firmly establishing 25th June each year as the ‘Day of the Seafarer’.
The resolution on piracy said that the IMO condemned and deplored all acts of piracy and armed robbery against ships, irrespective of where such acts occur, or may occur; and expressed deep sympathy for the loss of seafarers, while in captivity, for their plight while held hostage in appalling conditions, often for long periods of time and for their families.
Among other things, the resolution strongly urged governments that have not already done so to do everything in their power, promptly, to ensure that ships entitled to fly their flag comply with the preventive, evasive and defensive measures detailed in the best management practice guidance (BMP4) already promulgated through IMO.
It also urged governments to decide, as a matter of national policy, whether their vessels should be authorised to carry privately contracted armed security personnel (PCASP) and, if so, under what conditions.
In addition, port and coastal States were strongly urged to promulgate their national policies on the embarkation, disembarkation and carriage of PCASPs and of firearms, ammunition and security-related equipment to be used by them on board ships; and to make those policies and procedures known to the shipping industry, to the providers of privately contracted armed security personnel, plus to all member governments.
The resolution also said that governments should encourage their owners and operators to consider the provision of post-traumatic care for seafarers attacked, or held hostage by pirates and for their families and, in so doing, take into account recommendations and good practice guidance produced by the IMO, the shipping industry and welfare organisations.
Governments should establish, as necessary and when requested, plans and procedures to keep substantially interested states informed, as appropriate, about the welfare of seafarers in captivity on their vessels, measures being taken for the early release of such seafarers and the status of payment of their wages.
Altogether, 27 resolutions were adopted by the Assembly at the meeting.
As for the IMO’s Council, the following states were elected as members for the 2012-2013 biennium:
Category (a) 10 States with the largest interest in providing international shipping services:- China, Greece, Italy, Japan, Norway, Panama, South Korea, Russia, UK and US.
Category (b) 10 States with the largest interest in international seaborne trade:- Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, India, Netherlands, Spain and Sweden.
Category (c) 20 States not elected under (a) or (b) above, which have special interests in maritime transport or navigation and whose election to the Council will ensure the representation of all major geographic areas of the world: - Australia, Bahamas, Belgium, Chile, Cyprus, Denmark, Egypt, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kenya, Liberia, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, Morocco, Philippines, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand and Turkey.
The Council is the IMO’s executive body and is responsible, under the Assembly, for supervising the work of the organisation.
Between sessions of the Assembly, the Council performs all the functions of the Assembly, except that of making
recommendations to governments on maritime safety and pollution prevention.
The newly elected Council met following the conclusion of the 27th Assembly for its 107th session.
Pirates release tanker- keep four seafarers hostage
http://www.tankeroperator.com/news/todisplaynews.asp?NewsID=3136
Somali pirates have released a hijacked palm oil tanker and 21 crew members.
However, they kept four South Koreans as hostages, the ship’s Singapore-based operator said Thursday, according to Associated Press.
According to agency reports, the pirates promised to release all 25 crew members by Wednesday but instead took the four South Koreans ashore and they are now believed to be in Somalia, Glory Ship Management said.
“We are expending all efforts to secure the release of the four South Koreans still held as hostage,” Glory reportedly said.
Pirates seized the Singapore-registered 29,870 dwt ‘Gemini’ with her cargo 28,000 tonnes plus of crude palm oil off the coast of Kenya on 16th April, while she was en route from Indonesia.
Glory said that the released crew members — 13 Indonesians, five Chinese and three people from Myanmar — were in good health.
South Korea’s Foreign Ministry said it was co-operating closely with Glory to seek the four crew members’ release. However, it reiterated South Korea’s position not to negotiate with pirates.
In January, the South Korean military killed eight Somali pirates and captured five others in a raid on a hijacked South Korean-operated cargo ship in the Arabian Sea.
The five captured pirates were taken to South Korea and received long prison sentences.
Somali pirates have released a hijacked palm oil tanker and 21 crew members.
However, they kept four South Koreans as hostages, the ship’s Singapore-based operator said Thursday, according to Associated Press.
According to agency reports, the pirates promised to release all 25 crew members by Wednesday but instead took the four South Koreans ashore and they are now believed to be in Somalia, Glory Ship Management said.
“We are expending all efforts to secure the release of the four South Koreans still held as hostage,” Glory reportedly said.
Pirates seized the Singapore-registered 29,870 dwt ‘Gemini’ with her cargo 28,000 tonnes plus of crude palm oil off the coast of Kenya on 16th April, while she was en route from Indonesia.
Glory said that the released crew members — 13 Indonesians, five Chinese and three people from Myanmar — were in good health.
South Korea’s Foreign Ministry said it was co-operating closely with Glory to seek the four crew members’ release. However, it reiterated South Korea’s position not to negotiate with pirates.
In January, the South Korean military killed eight Somali pirates and captured five others in a raid on a hijacked South Korean-operated cargo ship in the Arabian Sea.
The five captured pirates were taken to South Korea and received long prison sentences.
Monday, December 5, 2011
Nigerian naira gains vs dlr on oil firms fx sales
LAGOS(Reuters) - The Nigerian naira currency strengthened against the U.S dollar on the interbank market on Monday after energy companies sold about $91 million.
The naira closed at 161.30 to the dollar on the interbank market from 161.40 Friday's close due to the inflows from two energy firms.
Traders said local unit of Chevron sold about $66 million to some lenders, while Agip sold $25 million which provided some dollar liquidity and support for the local currency.
In the official window, The central bank sold $200 million at 156.50 to the dollar, short of the $229.14 million demanded and compared with $200 million sold at 156.31 to the dollar at the previous auction on Wednesday.
Traders said the central bank continues to indirectly control demand and the bid rate at its bi-weekly auction in a move to reduce pressure on the local currency and ensure stability around its trading band.
"Officials of the central bank usually called around before the auction and asked banks to limit their dollar demand to a specific amount and also that they should not quote above a certain rate otherwise their bids will be disqualified," a traders told Reuters.
The central bank last month moved its target trading band for the naira to +/-3 percent around 155 naira, from +/-3 percent around 150 due to prolonged naira weakness and high dollar demand.
"The naira will depreciate further in the coming days because dollar supply is not coming as much again, while demand remain strong," another dealer said.
Traders said if the central bank continue to sell dollars directly in the market, the naira could trend around 161-161.60 in the near term, otherwise, it will eased further.
(Reporting by Oludare Mayowa; editing by Ron Askew)
Friday, December 2, 2011
Are EU Sanctions Against Iran Enough?
BY NOE GANDILLOT
ANCHOR CHRISTINA HARTMAN
More tension between Iran and the West, after the European Union tightened its sanctions against Tehran. Fox News has more :
“The European Union set to slap new sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program, days after hard line protesters attacked the British embassy there. Is Iran lurching towards war with the west?”
In total, the EU added 180 Iranian officials and companies to a blacklist that freezes their assets and bans travel to member states -- and has agreed to consider further punitive measures focused on Iran's banking, transport and energy sectors. The Washington Post reports that British Foreign Secretary William Hague expressed satisfaction:
But the New York Times reports there are reasons to be disappointed with the decisions:
“The measures fell well short of demands by Britain and France for an embargo on oil purchases from Iran, one of the world’s leading producers. Greece, a European Union member and a significant buyer of Iranian oil, expressed strong resistance to that step.
France’s Le Monde believes sanctions are likely to do more harm to the countries imposing the measures than to the Iranian regime itself.
The French paper says an embargo on oil would be hard to bear for countries like Spain, Greece and Italy, whose economies are shaky, and which import almost 15% of their oil from Iran.
And many doubt sanctions would actually put much pressure on Iran. RT’s political consultant Adrian Salbuchi says Iran can easily sell its oil to other countries:
“Since Iran has its back protected in part by China, and also in part by Russia, which seems to be getting fed up with these permanent events on the part of NATO, I don’t think sanctions will do the trick. That’s why the fear, the real terror, is that they might end up resorting to unilateral military invasion.”
And Iranian American Council Director Jamal Adbi expressed another concern to US News:
"Even if the sanctions are indeed successful in limiting oil profits to Iran, the Iranian people, rather than the regime itself, would feel the brunt of the economic losses.”
In addition to Great Britain, Italy, France, Germany and the Netherlands have already withdrawn their ambassadors from Tehran.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Shell Sells Oil Stakes in Nigeria
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203833104577072433730019366.html
By ALEXIS FLYNN
LONDON—Nigerian firms have bought onshore oil licenses from a group of European oil giants, including Royal Dutch Shell PLC, as the company continues to trim its assets in the country that are less integral to its strategic growth.
The Nigerian firms, some acting as a consortium and another backed by U.K. explorer Afren PLC, bought the licenses from Shell, Total SA and SPA's Agip unit, the companies announced Tuesday.
The deals for stakes in two oil production interests in the West African country have a total value of $732 million, with total cash proceeds to Shell's local joint venture of $488 million.
Shell, which operated both blocks, has already divested other Nigerian assets. The Anglo-Dutch oil major's operations onshore Nigeria have long been beset by sabotage and th eft and the company has faced decades of criticism from environmental and human-rights groups concerned about the impact its activities have had on the local ecosystem.
The company said the divestments were part of a strategy to refocus its Nigerian onshore interests and in line with the country's goal of giving indigenous companies a greater role in the country's oil and gas sector.
In a statement, Shell said it remained committed to keeping a long-term presence in the country "both onshore and offshore."
In one of Thursday's deals, Afren affiliate First Hydrocarbon Nigeria Ltd. said it paid $147.5 million for a 45% stake in Oil Mining Lease 26 from Shell, Total and Agip. The block currently produces around 6,000 barrels of oil a day from two fields.
Afren, which holds a 45% stake in FHN, said it plans to boost output to 40,000 barrels a day over the next four years before reaching plateau production of 50,000 barrels a day.
"This acquisition is a strong endorsement of Afren's long-term strategy of working with indigenous companies to reactivate fallow assets held by the major international oil companies in Nigeria," said Afren Chief Executive Osman Shahenshah.
The remaining 55% interest in the license is owned by Nigerian state oil firm, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corp. Afren said FHN will partner with NNPC's exploration and production arm in re-developing the block.
In the second deal announced Thursday, the Neconde Energy Ltd. consortium bought a 45% stake from the same three majors. The NNPC also holds the remaining interest.
The consortium is majority Nigerian-owned and includes Nestoil Group, Aries E&P Company Limited and VP Global, as well as Polish firm Kulczyk Oil Ventures.
According to a statement on the Kulczyk Web site, Neconde paid $585 million for the stake in the block, which covers some 814 square kilometers and includes several oil fields.
"Operations had been shut down because of militant activity, but production from the Batan field resumed earlier this year and is currently producing circa 15,000 barrels of oil per day," Shell said.
The deals have been approved by all relevant national authorities, Shell said.
Shell is still in the process of selling stakes in its other onshore licenses in Nigeria, though delays have reportedly arisen because some potential buyers have expressed concern about whether they will be able to take full operatorship of the blocks.
By ALEXIS FLYNN
LONDON—Nigerian firms have bought onshore oil licenses from a group of European oil giants, including Royal Dutch Shell PLC, as the company continues to trim its assets in the country that are less integral to its strategic growth.
The Nigerian firms, some acting as a consortium and another backed by U.K. explorer Afren PLC, bought the licenses from Shell, Total SA and SPA's Agip unit, the companies announced Tuesday.
The deals for stakes in two oil production interests in the West African country have a total value of $732 million, with total cash proceeds to Shell's local joint venture of $488 million.
Shell, which operated both blocks, has already divested other Nigerian assets. The Anglo-Dutch oil major's operations onshore Nigeria have long been beset by sabotage and th eft and the company has faced decades of criticism from environmental and human-rights groups concerned about the impact its activities have had on the local ecosystem.
The company said the divestments were part of a strategy to refocus its Nigerian onshore interests and in line with the country's goal of giving indigenous companies a greater role in the country's oil and gas sector.
In a statement, Shell said it remained committed to keeping a long-term presence in the country "both onshore and offshore."
In one of Thursday's deals, Afren affiliate First Hydrocarbon Nigeria Ltd. said it paid $147.5 million for a 45% stake in Oil Mining Lease 26 from Shell, Total and Agip. The block currently produces around 6,000 barrels of oil a day from two fields.
Afren, which holds a 45% stake in FHN, said it plans to boost output to 40,000 barrels a day over the next four years before reaching plateau production of 50,000 barrels a day.
"This acquisition is a strong endorsement of Afren's long-term strategy of working with indigenous companies to reactivate fallow assets held by the major international oil companies in Nigeria," said Afren Chief Executive Osman Shahenshah.
The remaining 55% interest in the license is owned by Nigerian state oil firm, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corp. Afren said FHN will partner with NNPC's exploration and production arm in re-developing the block.
In the second deal announced Thursday, the Neconde Energy Ltd. consortium bought a 45% stake from the same three majors. The NNPC also holds the remaining interest.
The consortium is majority Nigerian-owned and includes Nestoil Group, Aries E&P Company Limited and VP Global, as well as Polish firm Kulczyk Oil Ventures.
According to a statement on the Kulczyk Web site, Neconde paid $585 million for the stake in the block, which covers some 814 square kilometers and includes several oil fields.
"Operations had been shut down because of militant activity, but production from the Batan field resumed earlier this year and is currently producing circa 15,000 barrels of oil per day," Shell said.
The deals have been approved by all relevant national authorities, Shell said.
Shell is still in the process of selling stakes in its other onshore licenses in Nigeria, though delays have reportedly arisen because some potential buyers have expressed concern about whether they will be able to take full operatorship of the blocks.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
US crude oil supplies grew by 3.9 million barrels
NEW YORK (AP) — The nation's crude oil supplies increased last week, the government said Wednesday.
Crude supplies rose by 3.9 million barrels, or 1.2 percent, to 334.7 million barrels, which is 6.9 percent below year-ago levels, the Energy Department's Energy Information Administration said in its weekly report.
Analysts expected an increase of 1 million barrels for the week ended Nov. 25, according to Platts, the energy information arm of McGraw-Hill Cos.
Gasoline supplies rose by 200,000 barrels, or 0.1 percent, to 209.8 million barrels. That's 0.1 percent below year-ago levels. Analysts expected gasoline supplies to increase by 1.5 million barrels.
Demand for gasoline over the four weeks ended Nov. 25 was 2.9 percent below a year earlier, averaging 8.7 million barrels a day.
U.S. refineries ran at 84.6 percent of total capacity on average, 0.9 percentage point down from the prior week. Analysts expected capacity to rise to 86 percent.
Supplies of distillate fuel, which include diesel and heating oil, rose by 5.5 million barrels to 138.5 million barrels. Analysts expected distillate stocks to decline by 1.5 million barrels.
In morning trading benchmark crude rose $1.40 to $101.18 a barrel in New York.
WOW! VTTI and Summa to build $1 billion oil terminal in Rotterdam
The Port of Rotterdam and Shtandart TT signed a long-term agreement for a new major crude and products oil terminal at an area exceeding 55 hectares at the Tank Terminal Europoort West (TEW).
Shtandart is owned by the Russian Summa Group (75%) and Dutch VTTI (25%).
Shtandart TT will build 3 million m3 of storage facilities allocated for Urals crude oil and oil products. Investments are expected to total $1 billion (€0.75 billion). The new terminal will operate as an open hub terminal creating a trading platform for Urals crude oil.
Construction is expected to begin in 2013 resulting in an operational start-up in 2015.
VTTI is a 50/50 joint venture owned by Vitol Holding B.V. in the Netherlands, and MISC Berhad of Malaysia.
It owns and operates 11 petroleum product terminals with a gross combined capacity of nearly 6 million m3.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
T. Boone Pickens has a federal subsidy beef with the Koch brothers over natural gas, ethanol
By Sebastian BlancoRSS feed
Since the summer, natural gas supporter T. Boone Pickens (pictured) has been in an energy fight with the Koch brothers. Think of it as a battle of the conservative billionaires to see who can get more money from the federal government.
According to the Des Moines Register, Pickens has been working to encourage governmental support for natural gas vehicles. No surprise there, since Pickens believes it was given to us by God himself. The Koch brothers, on the other hand, have their hands out for a lot of ethanol subsidies even though they are often called Libertarian (or at the very least, deeply conservative). Pickens reportedly said recently that:
Koch Industries imports 61,000 barrels of OPEC oil a day to their Corpus Christi refinery. They're the third largest recipient of subsidies for ethanol, they're in the chemical business and the fertilizer business. So everything I do could affect them in some way. They're against me. I know Charles and David Koch. I asked them to talk to me about this subject; they would not do it. They would not return my phone calls. When I was one of their biggest customers in 2005, I heard from them and was entertained in their home in Wichita, but now (they) don't want to talk to me about it. They've gone and tried to peel off all the co-sponsors of the bill that they can. While they knocked out 14 I was getting 16. They spend a lot of money to do this. They're working for the Kochs, I'm working for America. I want an energy plan for America, they want an energy plan for the Koch's.
This past May, Charles Koch wrote an op-ed that claimed that Picken's call for natural gas to get subsidies "well-intentioned but misguided" even as it said that Kock didn't even want the ethanol subsidies he was collecting: "Because ethanol use is mandated, we were compelled to be in that business. We still oppose ethanol subsidies and mandates even though some of our businesses would benefit from them." A spokesman for the Koch brothers wrote to Congress in June that "We do not believe government should be picking 'winners and losers' in the marketplace." Well, of course you don't. Not once you're already winning.
News Source: Des Moines Register, Bloomberg, The Energy Fix
Libyan-U.S. Venture Waha Oil Co. Resumes Crude Output
By Ola Galal
(Bloomberg) -- Waha Oil Co., a U.S.-Libyan joint venture, resumed crude output at a rate of 16,000 barrels a day from two fields, representing 5 percent of its total production capacity, Libya’s National Oil Corp. said on its website today.
The Tripoli-based company plans to raise its output to the maximum level “as soon as possible” after pumping crude from the Dahra and Samah fields, Libyan state-run NOC said.
Waha Oil was producing 350,000 to 400,000 barrels of crude a day before protests erupted against Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, roughly a quarter of the country’s pre-crisis output. The company is 59 percent owned by NOC, with the rest held by ConocoPhillips, Marathon Oil Corp. and Hess Corp.
Libya, holder of Africa’s biggest crude reserves, is currently producing more than 750,000 barrels a day. The North African country pumped 1.6 million barrels a day before the rebellion broke out in February.
--Editors: John Buckley, Rob Verdonck
To contact the reporter on this story: Ola Galal at ogalal@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Stephen Voss at sev@bloomberg.net.
UPDATE 2-OPEC supply hits 3-year high on Libya return
* Angola, Libya lead increase in OPEC supplies
* Saudi Arabia, Kuwait also boost output
* For a table of output by country, see (Adds quotes, further details from paragraph 5)
By Alex Lawler
LONDON, (Reuters) - OPEC oil output has risen in November to a three-year high due to increased supplies from Angola and a further recovery in Libya's production, a Reuters survey found on Tuesday.
Supply from all 12 members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries is expected to average 30.27 million barrels per day (bpd) this month, up from a revised 29.81 million bpd in October, the survey of sources at oil companies, OPEC officials and analysts found.
The survey provides little evidence Gulf Arab OPEC producers are curbing output drastically to make way for Libya, a development consumer-country governments will welcome as oil prices remain well above $100 a barrel.
OPEC holds its next meeting on Dec. 14. With oil at $100 plus and Libya's output yet to reach the pre-war rate, analysts and OPEC officials are predicting a low-key gathering unlikely to make major changes to output policy.
"OPEC is on standby until they get a bit more clarity on what's happening in Libya and with Libyan exports," said Harry Tchilinguirian, head of commodity markets strategy at BNP Paribas in London.
"Generally speaking, the market is in balance," an official from one of OPEC's African members said. "Demand is not dropping that much and prices are likely to stay around current levels."
November's total is expected to be OPEC's highest since October 2008, shortly before the group agreed to a series of supply curbs to combat recession, based on Reuters surveys.
Brent crude pared an earlier gain after the survey was released and was trading up 95 cents at $109.95 at 1415 GMT.
The average price in 2011 is on course to beat 2008's record high of $103.40.
ANGOLA, LIBYA
The biggest increase in OPEC supply is coming from Angola, where Total's Pazflor field is expanding output.
Pazflor is one of several new projects expected to counter a 2011 decline in supplies from Africa's second-largest producer. Output in November also rose due to extra cargoes of crudes including Girassol and Cabinda.
In Libya, oil exports and refinery demand have amounted to 500,000 bpd in November, according to the survey, up 150,000 bpd from October but some way short of the production figures given by Libyan officials.
Supply in Africa's top producer Nigeria also increased as Royal Dutch Shell's Nigerian venture lifted a force majeure on exports of Forcados oil. But Shell's EA field was shut for maintenance, limiting the supply boost.
Saudi Arabia and its Gulf OPEC allies raised production unilaterally after failing at the group's last meeting in June to convince Iran and other members to agree a coordinated increase to meet a shortfall in supplies from Libya.
After a reduction in October, Saudi Arabia has increased supplies slightly in November due to higher demand from some customers in Asia, sources in the survey said.
Kuwait has also expanded output from an upwardly-revised October total. Nonetheless, sources in the survey have lower estimates of supply than Kuwaiti industry officials, who say the country is pumping 3 million bpd or more.
Ahead of December's OPEC meeting, Iran has called for countries that boosted output in the wake of the Libyan war and oil cutoff - effectively the Gulf Arab OPEC members - to reduce output to pre-Libya crisis volumes.
Gulf OPEC delegates have said they do not see a need for supply curbs yet but that they will curb output to make way for a recovery in Libyan supplies when it happens, although this will probably be a gradual process extending into 2012.
The Gulf Arab OPEC members are typically its most moderate on prices because they do not want high energy costs to restrict economic growth and long-term demand for their main source of export revenue.
One Gulf Arab official told Reuters in September a price of $90 was still "high" and those producers were unlikely to reduce supplies to prop up oil prices unless crude fell below $90 for a sustained period. (Editing by James Jukwey)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)